Re: encoding names

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, barry(at)xythos(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: encoding names
Date: 2001-08-22 08:09:50
Message-ID: 20010822170950F.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:02:49AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure if we are going to raise the FE/BE protocol number for
> > > > 7.2.
> > >
> > > We are not, as far as I know. I have made my changes without doing
> > > that.
> >
> > Ok. I think we should keep getdatabaseencoding() behaves as 7.1, and
> > add a new function which returns official encoding names.
>
> Ok, Is here some suggestion for name of this function?

The new function returns "canonical database encoding names". So

"get_canonical_database_encoding" or shorter name looks appropriate
to me.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomasz Zielonka 2001-08-22 08:44:12 Extending triggers capabilities (inserted/deleted pseudo tables)
Previous Message jozzano 2001-08-22 07:45:14 PATCH proposed with new features for CREATE TABLE

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-08-22 10:28:00 patch for JDBC1 build problems
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-08-22 01:39:09 RE: Re: [PATCHES] Array Support Fix