Re: Locale by default?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Locale by default?
Date: 2001-08-22 01:34:13
Message-ID: 20010822103413O.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If people set their locale to something other than C they have evidently
> judged that locale is not useless. Why would they set it otherwise?

As Hiroshi pointed out, the broken thing is the LC_COLLATE, other
things in the local are working.

> I
> don't think hiding away a feature because you think it's useless is a good
> idea. If people don't like it, allow them to turn it off. If there are
> potential problems related to the feature, document them.

I don't object the idea letting users turn it off. I said we need a
way to turn it off in the configuration/compile time.

> Face it, everything has locale support these day. PostgreSQL is one of
> the few packages that even has it as an option to turn it off. Users of
> binary packages of PostgreSQL are all invariably faced with locale
> features. So it's not like sudden unasked-for locale support is going to
> be a major shock.

I would say it's a misunderstanding that the locale (more precisely
LC_COLLATE) is usefull for *any* Language/encodings.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-08-22 01:34:37 Re: Locale by default?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-08-22 01:15:00 Re: List response time...