From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Date: | 2001-08-21 13:51:29 |
Message-ID: | 200108211351.f7LDpT125374@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >
> >It's up to the group to decide. If we have a database of bugs, I think
> >it has to be complete. I think a partial list is worse than no list at
> >all.
> >
>
> I disagree. Unless you are omniscient, we will only ever have a partial list.
>
> Perhaps more importantly, the more common ones will be in the list, because
> the more often it's reported, the more likely someone will use the bug
> tool. If we develop a culture that says 'if it's on the bug list, it will
> get looked at', then more people will report bugs via the correct channels
> etc.
That is the real question. Do we want to rely more heavily on a bug
database rather than the email lists? I haven't heard many say they
want that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-08-21 14:02:01 | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-08-21 13:49:05 | Re: Link to bug webpage |