Re: Feature Requests for 7.2 or 7.3 ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Ruprecht <chrup999(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature Requests for 7.2 or 7.3 ...
Date: 2001-08-03 21:36:33
Message-ID: 200108032136.f73LaXZ13764@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


I would hit the hackers list for active feature discussion, though you
can request features on SQL too.

> Hi guys,
>
> There are a number of features, I would love to see implemented in a future
> release of PostGreSQL, more specific, into PL/PGSQL. Is there a central
> place somewhere, where we (the PostGreSQL user community, I guess that is),
> is able to see what is planned for the future and where we can send some of
> the ideas we (constantly) have?
> It's nice to have such an active community with developers who actually
> listen to what their users have to say (I have some bad experiences with
> other systems...:).
>
> I just looked at the gram.y file for PL/PGSQL, but I have no idea what is
> actually going on there. I have a colleague here, who did compiler building
> in the past - he might understand the stuff though - maybe I can get him
> interested in implementing the one or other thing.
>
> Keep up the excellence ...
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message clayton cottingham 2001-08-03 21:55:37 Re: Feature Requests for 7.2 or 7.3 ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-03 21:21:38 Re: Re: Fuzzy matching