Re: Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Helge Bahmann <bahmann(at)math(dot)tu-freiberg(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Allow IDENT authentication on local connections (Linux only)
Date: 2001-07-31 23:11:34
Message-ID: 200107312311.f6VNBYx17677@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Can you send over your version for review. We can edit the 'peer' part.

> Tom Lane wrote:
> >[ redirected to pgsql-hackers for comment ]
> >
> >Helge Bahmann <bahmann(at)math(dot)tu-freiberg(dot)de> writes:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> There is a more complete version of this capability in the Debian patch
> >>> set. I think we've been waiting for Oliver to pull it out and submit it
> >>> as a patch...
> >
> >> Ok found it; uses "peer" as a keyword instead of "ident" but basically
> >> does the same thing. I think you can discard my patch then.
> >
> >Well, we need to talk about that. I like your idea of making ident auth
> >"just work" on local connections better than Oliver's approach of
> >inventing a separate auth-type keyword. So some kind of merger of the
> >two patches seems attractive to me. But Oliver may feel that he has to
> >continue to support the "peer" keyword on Debian anyway, for backwards
> >compatibility. If so, do we want different ways of doing the same thing
> >on different distros, or should we just follow the Debian precedent to
> >keep things ugly-but-consistent?
>
> This change has only been made in the unstable release; so I don't mind
> if peer and ident are folded together. Anyone running unstable knows
> the world may turn upside down beneath him!
>
> So if you have a patch to do that, go ahead.
>
> --
> Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
> Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
> PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
> GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
> ========================================
> "Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good
> courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed; for
> the LORD thy God is with thee whithersoever thou
> goest." Joshua 1:9
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-31 23:14:49 Re: pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 23:05:06 pg_hba.conf pre-parsing change