Re: Large queries - again...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large queries - again...
Date: 2001-07-20 22:53:28
Message-ID: 200107202253.f6KMrS423882@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > "As expected"? That's not what I'd expect, especially not for a
> > behavior that's dependent on the size of an *outgoing* message.
> It is expected, because it's the default message when a PQexec() query
> returns NULL: pqReadData() will return nothing yet no error is signed.
> Of course, the "really expected" would be a sucessfull exec :-)
>
> > (Thinks for awhile...) You're not using PQsetnonblocking() are you,
> > by any chance?
> No, I'm not. Asynchronous libpq connections on Windows are still not
> realiable (althought I read someone submitted a patch recently), so I'm
> keeping synchronous queries for a while. I'm not also using any non-standard
> functions; just plain PQconnectdb() and PQexec()...

Yes, just applied. I will have another one next week.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2001-07-20 23:05:46 Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-20 22:45:13 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)