[PATCH] Partial indices final?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [PATCH] Partial indices final?
Date: 2001-07-11 15:14:01
Message-ID: 20010712011401.A3918@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

OK, I've changed the vacuum code now so your index doesn't get
departialised. The changes seem pretty obvious so they're probably right.
They certainly didn't seem to break my simple tests. How does one test that
VACUUM works properly?

I think it's time to send it to pgsql-patches now, unless someone spots a
serious problem.

http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/partial-indices-7.2.patch

Anyway, now it's time to think about after. I can think of:
* Complete the removal of EXTEND INDEX
* Allow IS NULL in the predicate

Anything else?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Grant 2001-07-11 15:15:31 Re: [JDBC] JDBC and stored procedures
Previous Message Christian Bucanac 2001-07-11 15:13:20 RE: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Grant 2001-07-11 15:15:31 Re: [JDBC] JDBC and stored procedures
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2001-07-11 14:20:29 Re: [JDBC] JDBC and stored procedures