Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Samuel <michael(at)miknet(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-07-11 03:32:00
Message-ID: 200107110332.f6B3W0o02569@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:02:15AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This is the first time I am hearing people are more concerned about
> > pg_shadow security than the wire security. I can see cases where people
> > are on secure networks or are using only local users where having
> > pg_shadow encrypted is more important than crypt authentication.
> > Fortunately the new system will solve both problems.
>
> The crypt authentication currently used offers _no_ security. If I can
> sniff on the wire, I can hijack the tcp stream, and trick the client
> into doing password authentication.

It is my understanding that sniffing is much easier than hijacking. If
hijacking is a concern, you have to use SSL.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-07-11 03:32:10 Re: Performance tuning for linux, 1GB RAM, dual CPU?
Previous Message Michael Samuel 2001-07-11 03:24:53 Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords