Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: wsheldah(at)lexmark(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-28 15:12:33
Message-ID: 200106281512.f5SFCXI18705@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
>
> So does this impact Postgresql's performance on Windows as well? I think Apache
> had to rewrite their Windows port to use threads instead of processes before
> they got decent performance on that platform. Any chance of Postgresql doing
> that sort of thing? Not that I'm asking for the change; I'd just as soon use
> this as one more reason to keep running it on linux. :-)

Again, a PostgreSQL topic...

Going with threads is a major issue and not one we would do lightly.
The significant issue is that we may gain on certain platforms like
NT and maybe Solaris, but I am unsure about the others. We may lose on
the others and it is hard to make both a threaded and non-threaded
version of the backend. Yes, I know it can be done but is it worth the
effort is the question.

There is a TODO item with email about threads that you can review.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-06-28 15:14:09 Process weight (was:Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-28 15:10:04 Re: Slower on Solaris (NOT that Red Hat thread anymore)