Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: Philip Molter <philip(at)datafoundry(dot)net>
To: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-28 15:26:09
Message-ID: 20010628102609.P12723@datafoundry.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
: Possible. How many concurrent connections you have? How many postgresql
: processes you have running?

We have anywhere from 10-50 processes concurrently using the database
at any given time. One process is running a join with about 9 tables
in it approximately once every 1-2 seconds. The other processes are
updating data into three tables.

It's definitely related to indexing (and I think someone else posted
that the index space doesn't get freed, which could result in more work
for the OS and that it was on the TODO list). I just dropped and
recreated the indices on the most problematic of the tables (the one
that has just recently been taking 1-2 minutes to vacuum) and kernel
CPU usage went from about 17-20% to 4%.

* Philip Molter
* DataFoundry.net
* http://www.datafoundry.net/
* philip(at)datafoundry(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-28 15:30:39 Re: Bytea?
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-28 15:22:00 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL