Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: "Frank Ch(dot) Eigler" <fche(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-06-27 16:41:09
Message-ID: 20010627124109.E7873@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi -

tgl wrote:
: > Oh, I see finally. You already put a custom little
: > challenge/response authentication scheme into postgresql,
: [...]
: Long before any of the current generation of developers, AFAIK.

Okay. (Sorry about misinferring "You" above!)

: In any case, as several people have pointed out, one may well want to
: guard one's password more carefully than one guards the entire session
: contents. Running SSL on a session that may transfer many megabytes
: is a lot of overhead.

Sure, but that's a separate performance question that shouldn't affect
the logical layering of the mechanisms. With SSL, for example, methinks
it's possible to renegotiate a connection to turn off encryption after
a certain point.

- FChE

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-27 16:44:29 Re: Re: 7.2 items
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-27 16:40:46 Re: functions returning records