| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
| Date: | 2001-06-27 02:34:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200106270234.f5R2YGQ29559@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > There's no reason to spend any additional work on it.
>
> hmmm. what is the expected date of rollout of the new code with a backwards
> compatible API (i don't mind recompiling), which has encrypted passwords
> in pg_shadow?
It will be in 7.2, whenever that is. It will not talk to pre-7.2
clients once you encrypt pg_shadow entries.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-06-27 05:11:57 | Re: Re: 7.2 items |
| Previous Message | alavoor | 2001-06-27 02:31:19 | Most intelligent database technique: For PostgreSQL and MySQL |