From: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea |
Date: | 2001-06-24 10:33:31 |
Message-ID: | 20010624123330.A28320@l-t.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:46:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> writes:
> > Question to -hackers: currently there is not possible to cast
> > bytea to text and vice-versa. Is this intentional or bug?
>
> Intentional. text and friends do not like embedded nulls.
>
> If there were a cast it would have to be one that implies
> an I/O conversion, just like any other type that contains
> non-textual data.
Well, I have functions that should work on both - encode(),
digest(), hmac(). Probably should do then several entries. Ok.
But what should be return type of decrypt()? I imagine well
situations where user wants to crypt both bytea and text data.
When there is even not a way to cast them to each other, then
he is stuck for no good reason.
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-06-24 11:05:29 | Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM? |
Previous Message | Bernardo Pons | 2001-06-24 10:05:13 | RE: Extracting metadata about attributes from catalog |