Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?
Date: 2001-06-22 17:40:35
Message-ID: 20010622124035.A11715@lerami.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [010622 12:31]:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > What else?
>
> If you don't want to do the debugger work yourself, could you send me
> enough of the data to let me reproduce the problem?
how much data do you need? It's multi hundred megs. I can probably
get permission to give you a login on tide if that would be easier?

LER

>
> regards, tom lane

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Åkerud 2001-06-22 18:06:03 Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 17:31:52 Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?