Re: Postgres Internals

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dip <dds98(at)doc(dot)ic(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Internals
Date: 2001-06-21 01:00:59
Message-ID: 200106210100.f5L10x628196@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi All,
>
> Im running some benchmarking tests on mysql, postgres and interbase
> database servers.
>
> does anyone know the reasons why or know where i can find out some
> technical reasons why the postgres database server is particularly good
> in relation to the others or just by itself e.g. use of query
> optimisation or indexing etc. I'm only looking at creates, selects,
> inserts, update and delete statements. I've noticed it is slow at
> inserting data into tables, but especially quick at doing complex
> selects (i.e. containing many joins). Why is this so?

Our optimizer is very good compared to MySQL. Not sure about Interbase.
We even have GEQO for joins of >10 tables.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2001-06-21 01:37:10 Re: Backup and Recovery
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-06-21 00:10:45 RE: RE: [BUGS] Update is not atomic