On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Thoughts? Is there anything about this that might be unsafe? Should
> QueryCancel be set after *any* failure of recv() or send(), or only
> if certain errno codes are detected (and if so, which ones)?
Stevens identifies some errno codes that are not significant;
in particular, EINTR, EAGAIN, and EWOULDBLOCK. Of these, maybe
only the first occurs on a blocking socket.
Nathan Myers
ncm(at)zembu(dot)com