Re: Re: OpenOffice compile

From: Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Orsinger <orsingerc(at)epg(dot)lewis(dot)army_mil(dot)invalid>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: OpenOffice compile
Date: 2001-05-28 16:12:53
Message-ID: 20010528121253.T9538@reptiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:08:06AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only
> > compiled on four or five different architectures
>
> That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an
> _exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception
> handling. Very strange.

i beleive that Mozilla suffered from a similar fate when released by
Netscape.

while i don't know alot of people using Mozilla directly, i am aware of a
number of offshoot applications that are using the base source code.

i would agree that source-suites with 10 million lines of code are rather
un-wieldy.

however, i fully support the efforts of any group that tries to make it
a more sane thing.

OpenOffice/StarOffice/whatever would be a wonderful boon to the OSS movement.

it would be nice if the database engine behind it was a full fledge SQL
system like postgres.

--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-28 16:55:00 charin(), text_char() should return something else for empty input
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-28 16:06:16 Re: New/old style trigger API