Re: pgsql/src backend/catalog/index.c backend/pars ...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql/src backend/catalog/index.c backend/pars ...
Date: 2001-05-18 23:02:05
Message-ID: 200105182302.f4IN25K16114@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Here is my comment added to the top of the code. Is it correct?
>
> > * This code is confusing code because the database can accept
> > * relation.column, column.function, or relation.column.function.
> > * It can also be called as func(col) or func(col,col).
>
> That's correct.
>
> > * Funcname is the first parameter, and fargs are the rest.
>
> That's not, or at least it doesn't apply to the dot-notation cases.
> func(col) and col.func are equivalent notations and look the same
> by the time they get to this routine.

Oh, got it. I will put the old name back and update the comment.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2001-05-19 00:33:20 pgsql/src backend/parser/parse_expr.c backend/ ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-18 23:00:31 Re: pgsql/src backend/catalog/index.c backend/pars ...