Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_iplf

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_iplf
Date: 2001-05-15 00:49:03
Message-ID: 200105150049.f4F0n3I00231@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> I recommend reverting that change.
>
> > Doing it now, but just to the system catalogs. No reason to keep the
> > backend code.
>
> That's debatable; someday we might want the thing (after we fix CLUSTER).
> At least revert the client changes too.

In fact, the only reason I started poking around here is because I am
evaluating a JDBC patch that was going to reference indisclustered. The
user was guessing that it related to HASH, just like the ODBC coder.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-05-15 00:57:15 Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 00:33:00 Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl