Re: pg_index.indislossy

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_index.indislossy
Date: 2001-05-14 23:25:23
Message-ID: 200105142325.f4ENPNZ22216@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > I think that at least the GIST intarray (actually intset) methods use
> > > it.
> > >
> > > So you probably should _not_ remove it ;)
> >
> > I did a search and found it used only a few places. I do not see it
> > used as part of GIST. My rememberance is that it is involved in partial
> > indexes, where you index only certain values in a column. It was an old
> > idea that was never working in PostgreSQL.
>
> Let's avoid removing things for the sake of removing them ... might be an
> old idea that, if someone takes the time to research, might prove useful
> ...

Yea, there is actually some code attached to this vs. the others that
had no code at all. Are we ever going to do partial indexes? I guess
that is the question.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-14 23:26:25 Re: 7.2 items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-14 21:49:22 Re: pg_index.indislossy