Re: Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable, please ....

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Stephenson <mstephenson(at)tirin(dot)openworld(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: AGAIN: still no answer ... peter, or anybody knowledgeable, please ....
Date: 2001-05-08 16:29:25
Message-ID: 200105081629.f48GTPe04630@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> > Comments?
>
> The extra parenthesis are required (since java.sql.ResultSet doesn't
> have a method 'reallyResultSet()' which returns an object which can be
> succesfully cast as a 'org.postgresql.ResultSet), but I think it would be
> cleaner just to declare 'result' as 'org.postgresql.ResultSet' on line 27,
> that way none of the messy casts (of which there are 11) would be
> required..

I can apply a patch, but it is beyond my ability to code that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-08 16:34:42 Re: [JDBC] Re: Trouble with JDBC2 ResultSet.getDate()
Previous Message Palle Girgensohn 2001-05-08 16:28:54 Re: [JDBC] Re: Trouble with JDBC2 ResultSet.getDate()