Re: \c connects as another user instead I want in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \c connects as another user instead I want in psql
Date: 2001-05-07 18:40:33
Message-ID: 200105071840.f47IeXN19882@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think the original motivation for wanting to eliminate these columns
> was that we need usesysid and grosysid to be distinct (can't use the
> same ID for both a user and a group). Using OIDs as IDs would fix
> that, but it's overkill. Wouldn't it be sufficient to use an
> installation-wide sequence object to assign new IDs for new users and
> groups? We have no such animals at the present, but I see no reason
> why we couldn't make one.

Updated TODO to show both options:

* Add unique indexes to pg_shadow.usename and pg_shadow.usesysid or
switch to pg_shadow.oid as user id

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-07 18:48:11 Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-07 18:38:50 Re: Re: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL