| From: | Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Vladimir V(dot) Zolotych" <gsmith(at)eurocom(dot)od(dot)ua>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Lisp as procedural language |
| Date: | 2001-05-06 10:26:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20010506122648.A20919@l-t.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:12:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It'd theoretically be possible to support Lisp in the same way as we
> currently support Tcl, Perl, etc. The hard part is to find a suitable
> interpreter that is designed to be dynamically linked into other
> applications. Perl still hasn't got that quite right, and I imagine
> it's an even more foreign idea for most Lisp systems...
librep for emacs-like-lisp and I remember seeing couple of
Scheme libs too (guile, cant remember more ATM) Not that I
have looked them closely.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | com | 2001-05-06 10:27:16 | Wanted Sydney Australia, someone to explain PostgreSQL to a bunch of programmers |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-05-06 07:47:11 | Re: [HACKERS] MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: Re: A bug with pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?) |