Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: "Vladimir V(dot) Zolotych" <gsmith(at)eurocom(dot)od(dot)ua>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-05 20:21:57
Message-ID: 20010505222157.B9629@l-t.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 04:54:07PM +0300, Vladimir V. Zolotych wrote:
> I see the following
>
> proba=> select * from pg_language;

> lisp |f |f | 0|/usr/ucb/liszt

> Would you mind to tell me is it possible to use Lisp
> as procedural language ? Which Lisp (e.g Emacs-list,
> Common Lisp, etc.). If it is possible could you give
> me hints how I can do that ?

Huh? Seems like you already have using lisp? Ask your
sysadmin where did he got it? And meybe you/he could
post it to PostgreSQL lists too?

Or did you simply inserted a new row into pg_language?
Well, that's not the way it works. There needs to be a glue
layer between PostgreSQL and a language. You should study
code in pgsql/src/pl/{plperl,tcl} for how it is
implementer for Perl and Tcl. There is also plpgsql which
is stand-alone module.

> I'm using PosgtreSQL 7.0, Slackware 7.0, also I have
> Common Lisp (CMUCL 18c) installed.

Ok, but you need a little bit more for that...

--
marko

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-05-05 20:36:02 v7.1.1 Branched, Packaged and Released ...
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2001-05-05 20:00:47 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog