Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Casey Lyon <casey(at)earthcars(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()
Date: 2001-04-30 02:51:22
Message-ID: 200104300251.f3U2pMM08848@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >
> > doesn't this defeat the reasons for going to numerics? is there a reason
> > why its such a difficult thing to do a SELECT oid on pg_database and
> > pg_class to get this information? that's what I've been doing when I need
> > to know *shrug*
>
> Yes, but you can't do that if you can't start the database or can't
> connect for some reason. If people don't think it is worthwhile, we can
> delete the TODO item.
>
> For example, when someone has trouble figuring out which directory is
> which database, they can just ls and look at the symlinks. Seems like a
> nice feature.

I will admit we are not getting flooded with problems due to the new
numeric file names like I thought we would, so maybe it is not worth the
symlinks.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-04-30 02:56:28 Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-30 02:44:48 Re: Thanks, naming conventions, and count()