Re: WAL feature

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL feature
Date: 2001-04-28 00:44:39
Message-ID: 200104280044.f3S0idV19972@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > Yep, WAL collects all database changes into one file. Easy to see how
> > some other host trying to replication a different host would find the
> > WAL contents valuable.
>
> Unfortunately, slave database(s) should be on the same platform
> (hardware+OS) to be able to use information about *physical*
> changes in data files. Also, this would be still *async* replication.
> Maybe faster than rserv, maybe with less space requirements (no rserv'
> log table), but maybe not.
>
> I believe that making efforts to implement (bi-directional) *sync*
> replication would be more valuable.

Or maybe an platform-neutral interface to the WAL file. Seems this
would fit a need.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-04-28 01:04:34 Re: v7.1.1 branched and released on Tuesday ...
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-04-28 00:41:43 RE: WAL feature