| From: | Kyle VanderBeek <kylev(at)yaga(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) |
| Date: | 2001-04-17 18:29:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20010417112927.V30314@yaga.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:11:54AM -0400, Peter T Mount wrote:
> Erm, int8 isn't long, but an array of 8 int's (unless it's changed).
http://postgresql.readysetnet.com/users-lounge/docs/7.0/user/datatype.htm#AEN942
It is very much an 8-byte integer, the correlary to Java's Long/long.
--
Kyle.
"I hate every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpan-Z" -- Troy McClure
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jarmo Paavilainen | 2001-04-17 19:08:06 | SV: Foreign key checks/referential integrity. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-17 18:15:38 | Re: Real/effective user |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D. Hageman | 2001-04-17 22:39:13 | Fix for psql core dumping on bad user |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-17 14:53:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Large Object problems (was Re: JDBC int8 hack) |