From: | Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Solaris 7 SPARC passes tests (was Re: Re: [BUGS] Tests randomly failed) |
Date: | 2001-03-28 00:56:10 |
Message-ID: | 20010328025610.C98674@ilse.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:40:00AM +0200, Mathijs Brands allegedly wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:17:47PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut allegedly wrote:
> > Tom Lane writes:
> >
> > > Alexander Klimov <ask(at)wisdom(dot)weizmann(dot)ac(dot)il> writes:
> > > > Yes, it was really just incidence -- I try again, and 15 of 15 `make
> > > > check' passed with TCP sockets, but only 3 of 15 passed with UNIX
> > > > sockets. So, final decision is `Unix sockets are not relaible on Solaris'
> >
> > What become up 'set maxuprc=256'? I thought that made it work. Could
> > other people try it or has it been disproven?
>
> I'm giving this a test now...
No luck :( Tests still randomly crash. (This is an Ultra 10 machine.)
7.1RC1 on Solaris 7 SPARC does pass the regression tests (apart from the
random test, which seems to be ignored on Solaris). (This is an Ultra
420 machine.)
Cheers,
Mathijs
--
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
Erik Naggum
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-28 01:04:24 | Re: Spinlocks on SGI's |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-28 00:47:47 | Re: Feature Request: ALTER FUNCTION (or something like that) |