| From: | bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E(dot) Bruccoleri) |
|---|---|
| To: | mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl (Mathijs Brands) |
| Cc: | scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, bruc(at)acm(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Spinlocks on SGI's |
| Date: | 2001-03-28 02:14:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200103280214.VAA37420@stone.congenomics.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Mathijs,
>
> Wouldn't it be best to build IRIX 6.2 binaries? Those should run properly on
> IRIX 6.2 and anything newer. Of course, having both IRIX 6.2 and 6.5 binaries
> wouldn't really hurt...
It's not feasible to do this, nor is it worth it. Irix 6.5 is much
more reliable than Irix 6.2. --Bob
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | Phone: 609 737 6383 |
| President, Congenomics, Inc. | Fax: 609 737 7528 |
| 114 W Franklin Ave, Suite K1,4,5 | email: bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
| P.O. Box 314 | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
| Pennington, NJ 08534 | |
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-03-28 02:53:57 | Re: Re: 7.1 RC1 RPM |
| Previous Message | Mark Knox | 2001-03-28 01:49:24 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |