Re: Spinlocks on SGI's

From: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>
To: bruc(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
Date: 2001-03-27 14:02:49
Message-ID: 20010327160249.E62357@ilse.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:59:45AM -0500, Robert E. Bruccoleri allegedly wrote:
> I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> years ago (using the test_and_set library calls). It's been working
> for me ever since in a heavy multi-user environment. Please don't
> change it unless there's an overwhelming reason.
>
> Also, the GNU compiler systems works poorly on SGI's. In this
> environment, you need to stick to the SGI provided compilers. Once you
> get used to them, they work fairly well.

The problem is that SGI wants a couple of hundred dollars for it :(

Regards,

Mathijs
--
It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language
rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has
ever done.
Erik Naggum

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert E. Bruccoleri 2001-03-27 14:15:50 Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
Previous Message Robert E. Bruccoleri 2001-03-27 13:59:45 Spinlocks on SGI's