Re: CVS tags for betas and release candidate

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Matthias Juchem <matthias(at)euklid(dot)math(dot)uni-mannheim(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CVS tags for betas and release candidate
Date: 2001-03-27 13:35:15
Message-ID: 20010327053514.D9431@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [010327 05:31] wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [010327 04:53] wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthias Juchem wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi there.
> > > >
> > > > I was just looking for the CVS tags for downloading the beta6 and the
> > > > RC1 of 7.1 but there are only the following tags:
> > > >
> > > > REL_7_1_BETA2
> > > > REL_7_1_BETA3
> > > > REL_7_1
> > > >
> > > > Aren't there tags for the versions I am looking for?
> > >
> > > Nope ... doing the tags didn't work as well as was hoped, so we've just
> > > been using date ranges instead ... release itself will be tag'd ...
> >
> > You know you can nuke tags right?
>
> no, this one I didn't know ... how? :)

If you use `cvs tag -d symbolic_tag...', the sym-
bolic tag you specify is deleted instead of being
added. Warning: Be very certain of your ground
before you delete a tag; doing this effectively
discards some historical information, which may
later turn out to have been valuable.

--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert E. Bruccoleri 2001-03-27 13:59:45 Spinlocks on SGI's
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-27 13:31:41 Re: CVS tags for betas and release candidate