Re: pgindent run?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent run?
Date: 2001-03-22 15:37:14
Message-ID: 200103221537.KAA18268@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> > of obfuscating the code changes.
> >>
> >> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
> >> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least
> >> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.
>
> > What about having it happen on every CVS commit?
>
> Try that and you'll get all-out war. It's tough enough keeping in sync
> with the repository already.

Oh, well. I tried.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 15:52:10 Re: Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 15:36:24 Re: pgindent run?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-22 16:12:04 Re: pgindent run?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 15:36:24 Re: pgindent run?