| From: | Nat Howard <nrh(at)pupworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Beta6 for Tomorrow |
| Date: | 2001-03-19 01:13:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200103190113.f2J1DZR14830@spot.pupworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
I'll give it a try, and send the stuff to you directly, so you can
say something like "that isn't what I meant!".
>Nat Howard writes:
>
>> Not sure if this counts as *major*, but this jdbc1 compile
>> problem is presumably still there:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-bugs/2001-03/msg00003.html
>>
>> as the referenced source file hasn't been updated. If I recall
>> right, Peter was waiting for a java 1 SDK to be installed.
>
>Care to submit a patch? This seems easy enough to fix for someone with an
>appropriate JDK installed.
>
>--
>Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-19 01:23:04 | Re: new version of contrib-intarray |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-18 23:47:22 | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |