Re: Performance monitor

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-08 03:06:38
Message-ID: 200103080306.WAA19806@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think Bruce wants per-backend data, and this approach would seem to only
> get the data for the current backend.
>
> Also, I really don't like the proposal to write files to /tmp. If we want a
> perf tool, then we need to have something like 'top', which will
> continuously update. With 40 backends, the idea of writing 40 file to /tmp
> every second seems a little excessive to me.

My idea was to use 'ps' to gather most of the information, and just use
the internal stats when someone clicked on a backend and wanted more
information.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-08 03:12:16 Re: Performance monitor
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-08 02:46:37 Re: Proposed WAL changes