From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)Wien(dot)Spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: WAL & RC1 status |
Date: | 2001-03-05 16:25:00 |
Message-ID: | 200103051625.LAA09189@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)Wien(dot)Spardat(dot)at> writes:
> >> At least one of my concerns (single point of failure) would require a
> >> change to the layout of pg_control, which would force initdb anyway.
>
> > Was that the "only one checkpoint back in time in pg_control" issue ?
>
> Yes.
Is changing pg_control the thing that is going to require the initdb?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-05 16:26:38 | Re: Query Planning time increased 3 times on 7.1 compared to 7.0.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-05 16:13:52 | Re: AW: WAL & RC1 status |