Re: A patch for xlog.c

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A patch for xlog.c
Date: 2001-02-25 04:25:56
Message-ID: 200102250425.XAA03194@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org> writes:
> >> Diffs posted to pgsql-patches are generally considered to be requests
> >> for application of a patch. If this is only an experiment it had best
> >> be clearly labeled as such.
>
> > OK. Is there are better place for discussion of such?
>
> pgsql-hackers is the place to discuss anything that's experimental or
> otherwise concerned with future development.
>
> > [ possible merits of mmap ]
>
> Let's take up that discussion in pghackers.

I always felt the real benefit of mmap() would be to remove use of SysV
shared memory and use anon mmap() to prevent problems with SysV share
memory limits.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-25 04:28:53 mmap for zeroing WAL log
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-25 04:10:43 Re: A patch for xlog.c

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-25 04:28:53 mmap for zeroing WAL log
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-25 04:10:43 Re: A patch for xlog.c