Re: floating point representation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: floating point representation
Date: 2001-02-20 20:58:29
Message-ID: 200102202058.PAA22013@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think the idea of making a user-settable format string is a good one.
> I'm just afraid of the idea of trying to shoehorn in a solution at the
> last minute; if we do, we may find it's not quite right and then have
> a backwards-compatibility problem with fixing it. Besides, we are in
> "no new features" mode during beta. I think it should wait for 7.2.

Agreed. I have the items on the TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-20 21:04:58 Re: Re: A How-To: PostgreSQL from Tcl via ODBC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-20 20:55:26 Use of LP_DELETE in buffer header