Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)

From: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)
Date: 2001-02-19 20:06:21
Message-ID: 200102192006.PAA01950@jupiter.jw.home
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner wrote:
>
> P.S. Is Jan around? He's been very quiet recently...

He is,

just a little quiet. I can live with it either way. The main
problem, as said, is that we need to allow some keywords as
identifiers in PL/pgSQL like in the main parser. Actually we
added RESULT as a reserved word, what's a likely variable
name inside of functions. So I think we have something to do
anyway.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2001-02-19 20:11:46 Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-19 20:03:36 Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)