Re: PL/PgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS command

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/PgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS command
Date: 2001-02-12 17:36:30
Message-ID: 200102121736.MAA05144@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 12:04:08PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I see the new PL/PgSQL command:
> >
> > GET DIAGNOSTICS
> >
> > This seems like a poorly-worded command to me. It is meant to return
> > the number of rows affected by a previous query, right?
>
> Among other things, eventually. You get to blame the SQL standards
> committee, again:
>
>
> wallace$ grep 'GET DIAGNOSTICS' sql1992.txt
> GET DIAGNOSTICS <sql diagnostics information>
>

That is unbelievable! (But true.)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovacs Zoltan 2001-02-12 17:49:00 pg_dump output
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-02-12 17:28:03 RE: [ADMIN] SOS !!: Porstgress forgot all ! Help !