Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors

From: dom(at)idealx(dot)com
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors
Date: 2001-01-29 19:25:36
Message-ID: 20010129202536.D9891@seccotine.ird.idealx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This is flex, not yacc, and our lexer has been flex-only for a long
> time. It's possible that the hack would break in a future version
> of flex, but I doubt it. What else is a lexer going to use fprintf
> for?

Hmm, well of course you are right... (and I could use some sleep too
:-). OK, this becomes a non-issue then.

--
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les jardiniers >>

Dominique Quatravaux <dom(at)kilimandjaro(dot)dyndns(dot)org>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-01-29 19:29:52 Re: Size of TODO.detail
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-01-29 19:14:41 Re: BLOB HOWTO??