| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: This script will crash the connection |
| Date: | 2001-01-26 20:35:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200101262035.PAA03869@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Would be something for a STATEMENT trigger. We don't have 'em
> > yet and I'm not sure what kind of information they will
> > receive if we finally implement them. But the number of rows
> > affected by the statement is a good candidate.
>
> That's no help for a 7.1 solution however. We can't start inventing
> a new feature at this stage.
>
> What I am inclined to do is have the rewriter reject conditional rules
> that contain NOTIFY. That seems like the minimal restriction that will
> prevent a crash or incorrect behavior. Comments?
OK, added to TODO:
* Allow NOTIFY in rules
and removed from open items list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-01-26 20:49:30 | Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2001-01-26 20:24:34 | Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |