From: | aoki(at)acm(dot)org (Paul M(dot) Aoki) |
---|---|
To: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL jdbc list <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Re: no way in LargeObject API to detect short read? |
Date: | 2001-01-26 19:12:44 |
Message-ID: | 200101261912.f0QJCj728572@faerie.CS.Berkeley.EDU |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-jdbc |
Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Hmmm, what's the performance issues with this? Is there going to be a problem
> with very large LargeObject's?
you could probably be smarter about caching previous tell() state, if
that's what you mean.
jun's hack doesn't actually add any extra buffers or copies.
--
Paul M. Aoki / Xerox Palo Alto Research Center / 3333 Coyote Hill Road
aoki(at)acm(dot)org / Computer Science Laboratory / Palo Alto, CA 94304-1314
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-26 20:10:02 | Re: JDBC driver throws SQLException while parsing timestamp |
Previous Message | Michael Davis | 2001-01-26 17:50:17 | Bug with foreign keys and importing from a pg_dump file? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-26 20:15:47 | Re: Re: [JDBC] Open 7.1 items |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-01-26 15:07:27 | Re: Open 7.1 items |