Re: AW: int4 or int32

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: int4 or int32
Date: 2001-01-23 14:33:09
Message-ID: 200101231433.JAA05873@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > There were only a few to fix, so I fixed them.
> >
> > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > > Which one of these should we use?
> > > > int4 is a data type, int32 isn't. c.h has DatumGetInt8, but no
> > > > DatumGetInt64; it also has DatumGetInt32 but no
> > DatumGetInt4. fmgr has
>
> Wait a sec !
> The patch to timestamp.h and date.h replaces int4 with int instead of int32.
> At least the timestamp.h struct is on disk stuff, thus the patch is not so good :-)

Fixed to int32 now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2001-01-23 14:49:48 Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
Previous Message Alexander Jerusalem 2001-01-23 11:19:50 Re: postgres memory management