Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

From: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Date: 2001-01-17 17:07:49
Message-ID: 20010117120749.G346@dothill.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Tom,

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> >> That does not look like a bug;
>
> > My point was that the error message generated by the second postmaster
> > is *different* that the one generated for the same test case on a real
> > UNIX (i.e., Linux) platform.
>
> It is? I get exactly that message (modulo the obvious path and PID
> differences) when I try it. Are you comparing to 7.0.* on Linux
> perhaps? IIRC, 7.0 makes these tests in a different order than 7.1
> does.

Bingo! I *am* (still) using 7.0.3 on Linux. I assumed that this aspect
would not have changed between 7.0.3 and 7.1. There I go getting myself
in trouble again by assuming...

Thanks,
Jason

--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message JJAR 2001-01-17 19:25:44 RE: I Need a Help on a language problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-17 16:19:10 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch