Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names
Date: 2022-09-22 22:20:15
Message-ID: 2000544.1663885215@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> That makes it easy, then. I'll just take the least invasive approach
> possible with pg_dump: treat the names from function definitions as
> authoritative, and mechanically adjust the function declarations as
> needed to make everything agree.

WFM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2022-09-22 22:37:29 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-09-22 22:17:59 Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks