Re: (7.1) BIT datatype

From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: (7.1) BIT datatype
Date: 2000-12-21 22:29:45
Message-ID: 200012212229.eBLMTjP17261@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Oliver Elphick writes:
>
>> Some SQL92 functionality is missing from the BIT and VARBIT types.
>>
>> It should be possible to enter hexadecimal values as:
...
>This was omitted because in SQL99 the X'1001' notation also serves as a
>binary large object value under certain circumstances. Unfortunately,
>it's not exactly known what those circumstances are.

It seems a pity that we don't support the SQL92 version at least.
How much more convenient it is to enter X'FE1D' than B'1111111000011101'
(did I get that right?)

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to
us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And
His name will be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty
God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."
Isaiah 9:6

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-22 01:10:58 Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-12-21 22:11:25 Re: (7.1) BIT datatype