Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Most efficient setup

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Most efficient setup
Date: 2000-12-13 13:27:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:26:08PM +1100, Aarmel wrote:
> [...]
> database1 -> table1,  table2, table3
> database2 -> table1, table2, table3
> database3 -> table1, table2, table3.
> OR
> database ->   database1table1, database1table2, database3table1   etc.
> [...]
> Also we need to be able to search all the tables acrosss all the databases.

Since Postgres doesn't currently support queries over multiple
databases, the best choice would probably be putting all the tables
in a single database. And I'd be inclined to choose that design just
for simplicities sake anyway.



Neil Conway <neilconway(at)home(dot)com>
Get my GnuPG key from:
Encrypted mail welcomed

People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction
rather than surrender any material part of their advantage.
        -- John Kenneth Galbraith

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Christophe DevineDate: 2000-12-13 16:19:16
Subject: check_primary_key on Postgres 6.5.3-23
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2000-12-13 08:41:58
Subject: RE: [pgAdmin-support] passwords

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group