| From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lockhurst <lockhurst(at)cal2(dot)vsnl(dot)net(dot)in> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Timothy J Hitchens <tim(at)hitcho(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Which Linux Distribution |
| Date: | 2000-12-12 19:55:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20001212115537.I16205@fw.wintelcom.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
* Lockhurst <lockhurst(at)cal2(dot)vsnl(dot)net(dot)in> [001212 07:54] wrote:
> What about using a Beowolf cluster. We are really interested in
> a online music stor but donot have the money. Well -- as per as
> bandwidth is concerned - GOOD LUCK. For us we are not planning to
> launch it in internet, only planning to serve it through local
> cable in Indian metro cities.
What about it? (the Beowolf cluster)
A Beowolf cluster doesn't suddenly allow Postgresql to run on
multiple machines whilke acting as a single entity, there's libraries
that Postgresql must be ported to use afaik.
-Alfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-12-12 20:15:58 | Re: users work now with PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-12-12 19:42:53 | Re: users work now with PostgreSQL |