Re: Tuple size limits and upgrading

From: "Igor' Robul'" <igor(at)raduga(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tuple size limits and upgrading
Date: 2000-11-28 10:55:32
Message-ID: 20001128135532.A26600@linux.rainbow
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:36:20AM -0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> like to bump this up to at least 256K, although 512K would be nice. This is
> for the purpose of storing large text fields, although it's usefulness
If you don't need make index on this text field, and indexing BIG text
is not very good, you can store big text into BLOB
> might be extended for storing binary data as well (e.g. large images).
For binary data use BLOBs

--
Igor' Robul', Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga",
Sochi, Russia
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcin Bajer 2000-11-28 13:16:58 How to perform calculations on 'time' and 'interval' datatypes
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2000-11-28 10:54:51 sgmlspl?