| From: | "'Marko Kreen'" <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
| Date: | 2000-11-16 15:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20001116175107.A8900@l-t.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:32:43AM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> > Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib';
>
> Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision,
> here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what
> your suggesting here.
Do you know any url's where the SQL* standards could be looked
up?
Mark Hollomon's idea was to use 'package' not 'module', but
ofcourse it would be nice to be SQL* conforming.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-11-16 15:53:41 | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
| Previous Message | Frank Joerdens | 2000-11-16 15:44:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: DBD::Pg installation seems to fail with 7.1 libs |